Survey On Relationship Between "causation and knowledge" from the perspective of Jaspers and Mulla Sadra

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph. D. Student of Comparative Philosophy, Qom University, Qom, Iran

2 Faculty Member of University of Qom

3 Professor

Abstract

Jaspers and Mulla Sadra's view on Relationship Between "causation and knowledge" is based on the Existential-transcendental approach of their philosophy. Accordingly. The two common points are as follows: First, they both consider causalities as a rule of the objective world. Second, both argue that causation by the existence of the universe and to the analysis of the relationships of beings is related with cognition. Thus, they both tried to identify causation as proof and realization of knowledge.but, The distinction is as follows: First, the validity of the principle of causality in the absolute knowledge of the being and the existence of man; with the explanation that, causation in the thought of Mulla Sadra plays a fundamental role in human cognition, but from the perspective of Jaspers, the recognition of this Problems is out of traditional circle of cosmology and phenomenological categories. Second, the meaning and scope of freedom are different according to their attitude to the principle of causality. Jaspers denies the causality because it limits the freedom of man, but Mulla Sadra believes that man is free from the fact that he is forced and he is forced from the fact that he is free. Ultimately, Mulla Sadra seems to consider causation as a position for the transcendence of human. Jaspers, however, have put the denial of causality in the field of human will and behavior as a basis for justifying transcendence of human.

Keywords

References

  1. پارکینسون، جی‌اچ (1384) انواع مختلف علیّت، مسعود صادقی، پژوهش‌نامه فلسفه دین، شماره 5، 207-232.
  2. کاپلستون، فردریک (1375) تاریخ فلسفه، ج 7، داریوش آشوری، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی سروش.
  3. نصری، عبدالله (1387) خدا و انسان در فلسفه یاسپرس، تهران: فرهنگ اسلامی.
  4. کرمی، حسین (1385) انسان‌شناخت تطبیقی در آرا صدرا و یاسپرس، تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشار.
  5. خندان، علی‌اصغر (1391) کارل یاسپرس و نگاه وجودی به علیّت، پژوهش‌های هستی‌شناختی، شماره 2، 95-117.
  6. یاسپرس، کارل (1357)، افلاطون، محمدحسن لطفی، تهران: خوارزمی.
  7. ________، (1378)، کانت، عبدالحسین نقیب‌زاده، تهران: طهوری.
  8. ________، (1363)، آگوستین، محمدحسن لطفی، تهران: خوارزمی.
  9. ________، (1395)، فلسفۀ اگزیستانس، لیلا روستایی، تهران: کتاب پارسه.

10. صدرالدین شیرازی (ملاصدرا)، محمدبن ابراهیم (1368)، الحکمة المتعالیة فی الاسفار الاربعة العقلیة، قم: مکتبة المصطفوی.

  1. ________، (1382)، شواهد الربوبیه، تصحیح سید مصطفی محقق‌داماد، تهران: بنیاد حکمت اسلامی صدرا.

12. ________، (1376)، رسالۀ المشاعر، تصحیح سیدجلال‌الدین آشتیانی، تهران: امیرکبیر.

13. ________، (1370)، شرح اصول کافی، تهران: موسسه مطالعات فرهنگی.

14. ________، (1420)،العرشیة، بیروت: موسسه التاریخ العربی.

15. ________، (1363)، رسالة الخلق الاعمال، تهران: علوم اسلامی.

16. یزدان‌پناه، یدالله (1389)، حکمت اشراق، قم: سمت.

  1. Lacey, Alan (1996), A Dictionary of Philosophy, London: Routledge.
  2. Audi, Robert (1999), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Wallraff Charles F. (1970), Karl Jaspers, An Introduction to His philosophy, Princeton University Press.
  4. Oswald, schrag (1971), Existence, Existenz and Transcendence: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Karl Jaspers, Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.
  5. Jaspers, Karl, (1987), Existenz philosophie, Vol 108 of Zur Kritik der bürgerlichen Ideologie, Author Hans-Martin Gerlach. Publisher, Acad.Verlag.
  6. _______, (1969), Philosophy, Vol 1 & 2, E. B. Ashton,Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  7. _______, (1951), Way to wisdom, an introduction to philosophy, Ralph Manheim, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  8. ________, (1950), The Perennial Scope of Philosophy, Ralph Manheim. London: ruotledge.
New Intellectual Research
Volume 5, Issue 9 - Serial Number 9
September 2020
Pages 9-22

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics