نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه ارتباطات دانشگاه آزاد اراک.
2 دانشیار گروه ارتباطات دانشگاه آزاد تهران مرکز
3 دانشجوی دکتری فرهنگ و ارتباطات دانشگاه آزاد تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Using the method of critical discourse analysis, this article examines the contrast between the two approaches of "antipathy and tolerance" in the religious messages of two famous Iranian religious figures, Ali Reza Panahian and Hassan Aghamiri, on the social network Instagram. The theoretical basis of the research is the theory of the religious message market, according to which, in the field of religion, like in other fields, there is a market of supply and demand. In order to gain a greater share of this competitive audience market, suppliers adopt strategies to differentiate their messages from those of their competitors. One of these strategies is to emphasize antipathy or tolerance in the message in order to be more popular with the target audience. The question now is whether the formation of a competitive market for religious messages on this social network has led to the strengthening of either the antipathy or the tolerance approach. The findings of this study show that in this competitive market, both antipathy and tolerance approaches have supporters, but Aghamiri’s tolerance-oriented discourse has attracted a much larger audience with a 41% reach. Therefore, it seems that in this particular case, the competitive market for religious messages on Instagram has led to the strengthening of the tolerance approach. This study can help to better understand the impact of the competitive market for religious messages on the formation of different religious discourses in Iran.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
احمدی، بابک. (1382). «مدرنیته و اندیشۀ انتقادی». نامه علوم اجتماعی. ش16. ص 132-156.
بشیر، حسن. (1400). «فرایند ساخت معنا در تحلیل گفتمان با روش پدام با مطالعۀ موردی بیداری اسلامی». روش شناسی علوم انسانی. ش27(106). صص31-48.
شجاعی زند، علیرضا. (1382). «دین و پدیدۀ جهانی». فصلنامۀ علوم اجتماعی. ش10(21). ص1-51.
فرکلاف، نورمن. (1380). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی (مترجم: فاطمه شایسته پیران و دیگران). تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات رسانه‌ها.
نوبوتاکا، اینوئه (1376). «اطلاعات و جهانی شدن دین» (مترجم حسن افشار). نامۀ پژوهش فرهنگی. ش5 و 6. صص 127-142.
Clarke, P. (2006). New Religious Movement In Global Perspective: A Study Of Religious Change In The Modern World. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.
Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping our Lives. New York: Routledge. pp. 45-67.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 56-78.
Nobutaka,I.(1997)" The Information Age and the Globalization of Religion". In INOUE Nobutaka ( General Editor), (1997). Globalization and Indigenous Culture. Originally published by the Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University.
Iannaccone, Laurence R. (1997 a): "Rational Choice: Framework for the Social Scientific Study of Religion" in ERel Archive, from: http://www.religionomics.com/erel/S2-Archives/S21_Publications.htm
Rezai,M.(2006)” The Structure of Religioud Market and its Rile in Producing Violence”. A paper presented at the 2006 CESNUR International Conference ; Globalization,Religion and Conflict, in San Diego, California.
Turner, B. S. (1994). Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism. London: Routledge.
)